Episode Summary
In this episode of "Wrestling Payments," Joe Casali and Kevin Olsen continue their discussion from the International Payments Alliance meeting by NACHA, diving into various topics surrounding payment systems and regulations. They start by addressing the move in Germany to eliminate checks and explore how the reduction of paper transactions could simplify banking systems. Kevin points out that while checks have been a long-standing payment method, most use cases for checks can be replaced by instant or recurring payments, except for scenarios where checks are deliberately not meant to be deposited.
The conversation then shifts to comparing the regulatory frameworks and roles of service providers in the US and Europe. Kevin highlights that in Europe, service providers often have more direct regulatory oversight and higher requirements compared to the US. He discusses the implications of such differences on the efficiency and responsibilities of these providers.
Finally, they dive into the concept of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and the digital euro, reflecting on the controversies and discussions around privacy, technology adoption, and regulatory challenges. They note the contrasting approaches and advancements in digital payment systems between the US and other countries, emphasizing the potential and complexities of moving towards a more digital financial ecosystem.
Guest-at-a-Glance
π‘ Guest: Kevin “Payments Professor” Olsen
π‘Company: Pidgin
π‘Where to find Kevin: LinkedIn
Key Insights
Germany Eliminates Checks to Streamline Banking
Germany is transitioning away from checks, aiming to streamline its banking system by eliminating paper transactions. The majority of traditional check use cases can be replaced by instant or recurring payments like FedNow, RTP, or ACH. The only exception involves checks sent with the hope they won't be cashed, a niche use case. This move raises questions about the adaptability of banks and customers who are accustomed to checks. The transition highlights the differences between regulatory approaches in Germany and the US, where mandates are less common, and checks remain deeply ingrained in the financial landscape.
European Service Providers Face Stricter Regulation
Service providers in Europe operate under more stringent regulatory oversight compared to their US counterparts. European providers often need direct approval from central banks and must meet higher standards. This system contrasts with the US approach, where financial institutions are primarily responsible for their service providers, who must notify them of any impactful changes. These differences underscore the varied regulatory landscapes across regions and their implications for service provider responsibilities and capabilities. The European model's emphasis on direct regulation could influence future US policies as global financial integration continues to evolve.
Central Bank Digital Currencies: The Future of Money
The development of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), like the digital euro, is progressing rapidly, driven by privacy concerns and technological advancements. While some countries, particularly in Asia, are embracing CBDCs, others, including the US, are more cautious. The debate centers on issues of privacy, control, and the potential benefits of a fully digital currency. This movement towards digital currencies is seen as a natural evolution of existing digital money systems, where physical cash is already largely replaced by electronic balances. The discussion also touches on the complexities and regulatory challenges of implementing CBDCs, reflecting a broader trend towards digital transformation in global finance.
Episode Highlights
Instant Payments Systems Gain Traction
Timestamp: [00:04:03]
The discussion highlights the global shift towards instant payment systems, which are increasingly replacing traditional methods like checks. This transition is more advanced in other countries compared to the US. While the US is still exploring use cases for instant payments, other nations have already integrated these systems into daily financial transactions, processing millions of transactions monthly.
"For their instant payments, it's still in the millions, but they're reaching it higher. So they're in millions and millions though. Whereas we look at RTP, which I would say is successful because it's millions per month now too, but there are more like millions per day."
Stricter European Regulations for Service Providers
Timestamp: [00:06:27]
The conversation compares the regulatory frameworks in the US and Europe, noting that European service providers often face stricter regulations and direct oversight from central banks. This contrasts with the US, where financial institutions bear the primary responsibility for their service providers, and regulations are generally less stringent.
"But overall, it says the financial institution is going to be responsible for their service provider. And the section really says, hey, as a service provider, if you do anything that affects the financial institution, you have to let them know. There, it is more like the service provider signs up directly to work with the central bank to be vetted by and approved by the different associations, organizations and central banks that allow them to get their licensing to be able to proceed and move forward."
UPI’s Explosive Growth in India
Timestamp: [00:23:51]
The discussion delves into the success of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) in India, which has seen phenomenal adoption rates due to government incentives and widespread utility. UPI processed 14 billion transactions in May 2024 alone, demonstrating its extensive reach and efficiency. The system integrates various payment capabilities into a single platform, greatly simplifying transactions for users.
"Fourteen billion transactions in one month. All right, that just, now it wasn't at the beginning, but in May of 2024, 14 billion transactions, billion with a B [...] To see how well it's perceived by end users, that was phenomenal. To see the actual numbers, the use cases, that was phenomenal."
The Concept and Challenges of Offline Payments
Timestamp: [00:18:22]
The podcast explores the idea of offline payments, which allow instant transactions even when the payment service is unavailable. This concept is particularly relevant in cashless societies like Norway, where digital payments are ubiquitous. The episode addresses the potential challenges and solutions for maintaining payment continuity in fully digital environments.
"Now, when you say offline payments it kind of needs to be defined and it is basically an instant payment made when the instant payment service isn't available. Wait, what? Yeah, and I was even, okay, how do you do that? And they explained it would be like a card, or similar to what we see with cards. It would be the storing of the information to be able to process it later."
To hear this episode and many more like it, subscribe to Wrestling Payments on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen to podcasts, or listen above.